
DON’T THEY SEE THAT PUMPS LAND PRICES?


___oooOooo___
“What’s changed that’s got the major parties down from an 80% following to only 50%?“
I think you missed the point in your discussion, guys.
“It’s the economy, stupid!“ …… Still.
Most people are hurting financially and complaining about the cost-of-living as we head into another depression but, like the commercial channels, it appears ABC-TV commentators believe they’re unable to say that? It would be honest to say it, but it’s seen as being ‘negative’?
So, the fundamental problem causing major political party distress remains twofold:
1. The level of taxes on our incomes and purchases, and
2. Our impossibly escalated land prices.
They’re ignoring both!
You first heard and saw what’s really happening here, folks!


Uh, Albo? Jim?
Q: Don’t government bonds ‘financialise’ us?
Don’t land prices ‘financialise’ us?
Don’t superannuation payments ‘financialise’ us?
That is, doesn’t each of these add to making us impossibly overindebted?
A: Yes, your observation is correct: bonds, land prices, and superannuation are core engines of financialisation, but they drive overindebtedness in fundamentally different ways. Financialisation refers to the growing dominance of financial markets, motives, and institutions over the real economy. [1]
Here is how each element drives this systemic debt trap:
1. Bonds and Public Debt
Bonds do not just fund governments; they turn future tax revenues into tradeable financial commodities.
2. Land Prices and Mortgage Debt
Land prices financialise daily life by turning a basic human need—shelter—into a leveraged investment vehicle.
3. Superannuation and Market Dependence
Superannuation (or mandatory pensions) financialises retirement by replacing state-guaranteed security with market-linked risk.
OK – Thanks, my friend thought so!

Uh, over to you, Albo?








Taxes generate deadweight losses.
Land rents don’t. They funds abundance and prosperity.

