Two highlights of my past week have been Prosper Australia‘s excellent Monday night sessions on Modern Monetary Theory (MMT). They were presented by knowledgeable young gun, Jesse Hermans.

Herman’s strong graphics were supported by an excellent commentary and impeccable logic in his response to questions.

Those not acquainted with MMT are usually blown away when shown the illogical hoops through which current practices in the banking world make us all jump. But it has to be this way, because the 0.1% need to be able justify the unjustifiable. Chicanery is essential if the 0.1% is to continue to channel wealth unto themselves via the rent-seeking mechanism. 

As a Henry Georgist favouring Land Value Taxation (LVT), I’d argue that rent-seeking is responsible for inflation, via land price inflation and the taxation that is applied to labour and capital. This explanation of inflation remains entirely invisible to orthodox economists.

So, it’s encouraging that some MMTers, such Warren Mosler, have seen the need for a real estate tax “to anchor the currency.” Others, a little more agnostic on the point, have to explain how within an MMT-driven economy they’d keep a lid on the inflation emanating from perpetually escalating land prices. Capturing land rent has potential to reduce land price towards zero.

The same question, of course, could be asked of proponents of a Universal Basic Income (UBI), another thoughtful proposition amongst emerging economic ideas.

Without applying a brake to land prices and arbitrary taxes on wages and the return to capital, the outrage of those privatising what  are essentially public rents will continue to bedevil world economies. It’s these two extreme pathologies that have delivered us into an historic financial quagmire.


“This Carnage Stops Right Now.”

I listened (at 4:00 am Australian Eastern Daylight Savings Time) to Donald Trump being sworn in as the 44th man to hold the presidency of the United States of America (the 45th president, because Grover Cleveland held the presidency twice).

Listened also to his 16 minute speech claiming that “the establishment” in the US has been winning out at the expense of the people of America. That’s true enough, I thought, as he then proceeded to list the things he intends to fix–as though he was still running as a candidate–but that’s OK, too, because it permitted me to tweet:-

TRUMPOTUS: The inaugural speech sets an agenda against which @DonaldJTrumpJr is easily measurable.

But I’ll tell you why I believe President Trump must fail the test of resurrecting the US economy. He doesn’t understand economics. He may understand business deals, but no one–other than those who factor the land market into their considerations–understands why the study of economics fails us. This unfortunately includes national leaders such as George W Bush, Barack Obama, Tony Blair, Gordon Brown, Angela Merkel, John Howard, Kevin Rudd, Julia Gillard, Tony Abbott and Malcolm Turnbull–who have all failed us.  [Wow! Hasn’t Australia been well represented lately!]

A scientific economic explanation would have enabled us to forecast the 2007/2008 global financial collapse, but we are reminded by neoliberal economists that economics is not a science. This is borne out by their extraordinarily superficial mathematical models which consistently fail, laying bare a fatal flaw: our leaders are too reliant on mainstream economists, and economic models that don’t reflect the real world. President Trump’s apparently going to fix that.

It’s here that Donald Trump needs to commence his financial reforms: heeding those heterodox economists who hold political economy to be a science and, in doing so, actually predicted the collapse of world property and financial markets from their 2007 peak. They are overly represented by the Georgist school of economics. Those who forecast the collapse who don’t see themselves as supporters of the ideas of Henry George at least factored the unsustainable financialisation of world real estate markets into their considerations.

Is Donald Trump, who notoriously made his money/holds debt against his real estate assets, going to un-tax wages and profits and capture the economic rent of land and other natural resources to “make America great again”?  I think not.

Where Australia’s ‘World’s Greatest Treasurers’ Failed

  1. Paul Keating

Paul Keating was the leader Australia had to have.  As Treasurer, he displayed great ability in floating the dollar and deregulating the market. His determination and commitment to Australia couldn’t be doubted, but he failed entirely to see that the real estate market leads and directs the economy. In this, he was mentored by his economic and political advisors, including  RBA and Treasury economists, and the great Jack Lang who was dismissed as New South Wales Premier by the Governor during the 1930s depression.

Kerry O’Brien’s ‘KEATING’ is a detailed 794 page account of Paul Keating’s intensive political career but, incredibly, there is not one word of acknowledgement of:-

  1.  the up-until-then world’s greatest real estate/financial bubble of 1973 which burst and had the Whitlam government (of which Keating was a member) dismissed by the Governor-General in similar fashion to Jack Lang

2)   the collapse of the 1981 land price bubble which saw the people  throw out the Fraser Liberal government

3)   the 1988/89 property bubble over which Keating presided as Treasurer and brought on “the recession we had to have” in 1991. (There was a one-line throw away mention, only, of the latter – of funds having flowed into “assets”.)

2.   Wayne Swan

In his book ‘ THE GOOD FIGHT: Six years, two prime ministers and staring down the Great Recession’, Wayne Swan tells us he was alerted as Treasurer in a phone call from US Treasury secretary, Hank Paulson at 6:30 am on 10 January 2008 of the need to keep the Australian real estate bubble inflated.  “Look“, said Paulson, “if we can avoid a meltdown in house prices, then we may be able to see a way through this.

Such was the importance of this “No Ordinary Phone Call” from Paulson it constitutes the opening chapter of Swan’s book.

The Rudd/Swan government took seriously Paulson’s advice to prop up Australia’s land price bubble: amongst other actions, it urgently spent some $50 billion-plus in a $900 grant to every, man, woman and child, a program to install  insulating ceiling batts to Australian homes, and a school building program.

Whilst it was too late for the US, it can’t be doubted that Swan’s action assisted–along with iron ore sales to China–to ‘save’ Australia from the global recessions experienced in the USA and Europe.

However, this only deferred the Australian real estate correction for another day, simply ‘kicking the can down along the road’.

So now, President Trump?

The signs are that the man is a blowhard. He can only be successful if he acknowledges the devastating role escalating land prices–to which his own businesses are inextricably wedded–has had in bringing world economies to their knees. And, as Eliza Doolittle might say, that’s “Not bloody likely!

I believe the next four years are about to display all the contagious symptoms of Trumpotus intractibilis.

I’d like to proven wrong.




And Another Thing

Property-investor MPs should excuse themselves from any vote to abolish negative gearing.

Hedley Finger, Camberwell


Governed in prose, signed off today in platitudes. Your saving grace was an attempt to improve health care for the poor, plus today’s admission that social progress is “not good enough”. However, simply blaming it on a long term trend doesn’t wash, unless you recognise that trend has long been directed by recent US presidents, including yourself, being captive of Wall Street and warmongers, President Obama?

Good luck!